Post 118 Slab roller

It's the big pots that did it. The straws that broke my back. Well not exactly but getting a large piece of clay to a uniform thickness and flat using a hand roller and a couple of sticks is not easy. Making smaller pieces and then joining them will not produce a marketable product of the right standard. Pieces of clay which have been rolled in different directions and not joined in the same alignment may choose to go their separate ways later during firing. At the very least the joins are hard to hide.
I even made a new hand roller out of large diameter PVC pipe filled with concrete. It was good but heavy.

My conscience and chair of our ethics committee (my dear wife) has just reminded me as I write this, about hand building with a capital H and the possibility of the compromise I was making to my artisan's principles. Ha, well from now on they kick in after the clay has been rolled.

I say from now on because Father's day has just come early with the arrival of my new slab roller from the good old USof A. Two weeks in the mail from order; thank you internet and USPS.

 The roller from North Star has an operating width of 24 inches, is gear driven and has two counter-rotating knurled aluminium rollers. It has individual depth adjustment on each side. This is how I bought it - bare of a table, so I could do a custom setup, which I have now done.

  

The idea was to make a movable feed in table that I could position adjacent to my work bench as I needed it. This picture shows that part and the wheels just under one end so it moves like a wheel barrow.

And here we are with it butted up to the workbench. You can see my rollers and depth sticks on the shelf under the bench - can't see that I'll be using them much anymore, what a shame! I wonder what I'll do tomorrow?

Post 117 Biggest pot to date

Some time ago I posted a picture of this pot when it was being made and upside down. Well it has finally worked its way through the pipeline to completion. I should fess up to the fact that this is actually the second one I made; the first just was not up to scratch.

The final size of the pot came in at 600mm x 420mm x 55mm which was right on the required spec. This is the largest pot I've made to date and there will not be a bigger one. The design process started with a paper template to place in the kiln, on the diagonal, to find out just how big I could go. That worked out at about 670mm, which meant that I made it so that when it was wet it was too big for the kiln and I was relying on the shrinkage from wet to dry to get it in the kiln for bisque firing; very tight. I couldn't get the same length with a rectangular one.

The clay is Clayworks LGH and fired a nice cream offwhite. The clay works well and behaved well throughout the process.

The glaze colour was also a special request and I actually ran a test of about 15 offwhites to get the right tone - not too yellow , not too pink, but just right!  The only colourants are titanium and tin, both of which can be quite influential on colour when you are looking for subtle shades.

A lot of trouble for one pot, I hear you say and yes that's right but each new challenge represents a learning opportunity that should make the next time easier and the investment in time hopefully gets spread over many not just the one. For the time I've invested it certainly is great value for money, but I now know just a little more about this craft than I did before, too.

I hope the next time you see this pot it will be under a forest planting of Tridents at the NBPC in Canberra.

My latest challenge is clay. Since the relaunch of Clayworks RGH, reformulated with a new RIO colourant my early experience is mostly unhappy which is why there haven'tbeen too many  'new pots' posts lately. The clay characteristics and my working patterns seem to be less compatible than they were and I am faced with moving to a different stoneware choice that may be berrter suited to the sort of handbuilding I do. I have trialled a couple previously and have at least two to test more widely. What do they say about the only stable thing being change!

Post 116 More on the Aphananthe

I continued to be bemused by the different shape of the leaves I collected when looking for the Native Elm of the last post.

The leaves on the right are clearly a different shape and possibly too different to be the same species as the 4 confirmed Apananthe philippinensis leaves on the left. The philippinensis leaves are heavier, rougher in texture and the serrations have a real little spike on them like a holly. The leaves on the right are lanceolate (come to a point), softer and the serrations do not have the same sharp spikes.

So some more searching and I found that there are three species of Aphananthe; philippinensis, aspera and cuspidata. A. aspera comes from China, Japan, Korea and Viet-nam and shares many of the macro features of philippinensis.

Here is an identifying picture of its leaves:

And then a picture of the trunk of one growing in Japan: Pretty impressive example.

 

 And here is another younger one from Kyoto.

This one could be a great bonsai candidate, good leaf reduction, elm like growth habit, fluted trunk etc etc.

The interesting thing is that the good Save Our Waterways folks who have done fantastic regeneration work over a long period along Enoggera Creek removing week species and rebuilding native populations, may have inadvertantly introduced a foreigner. 

I have of course done the right thing, let them know and offered to take them if they decide to dig them out!!!

If they leave them there, in close proximity to the philippinensis, it might lead to some interesting vigorous hybrids in the years ahead.